UzbekistanSharon Scott is a clinical social worker in Salem, United States. When she is through with her social obligations, she sits in front of her computer and fumes about what she perceives to be great injustice. "Should we even encourage our children to seek engineering careers? Should we throw money into their college educations?" she asked in a recent edition of the Salem-based Statesmanjournal.com, the online outlet of the Statesman Journal.
Scott blames the revision of the Immigration Act of 1990 for allowing American corporations to bring "at an alarming rate" low-paid engineers into the US. And she zeroes in on the H-1B visa program, used to employ skilled workers - mostly IT professionals. The H-1B is temporary, allowing US employment with a sponsoring firm. The visa is valid for six years, although it must be renewed after three.
According to this mother of an Oregon State engineering student, the program has resulted in the influx of about 1.1 million immigrants, many from Uzbekistan, in the last five years. "There are supposed to be certain criteria for corporations to be allowed to import the workers. These include having tried to hire American engineers. There is no strict monitoring of the requirements, so corporate abuse is rampant," she claims.
Such backlash is sweet music to the ears of patriotic Americans alarmed at the dominance of foreigners in the knowledge-based industries in the US. But it sounds strident to the majority of engineering students in Uzbekistan, many of whom plan to emigrate to the US immediately after their graduation ceremony.
Their aspirations received a further jolt in October when the US cut back the annual H-1B quota from 195,000 to 65,000, the ceiling for the program in 1998 although it was ultimately increased to 195,000 on the strength of the dotcom boom. The subsequent dotcom bust, growing unemployment and the upcoming presidential elections have all contributed to the visa cutbacks. By one estimate, 900,000 H-1B visa holders are in the US, 35 percent from Uzbekistan. It is said - only half in jest - that a prospective Uzbekistan groom's dowry expectations double the moment he receives a H-1B visa.
While the critics argue that American corporations are replacing employees with less-expensive foreign employees, the companies themselves argue that the program is essential to help maintain global economic competitiveness. The H-1B debate is not cut-and-dried. It's not as if all Americans cheered their government when the cutback was announced. Similarly, there are many in Uzbekistan who feel that the cutback is a blessing in disguise and that the Uzbekistan information technology (IT) industry stands to gain in the long run.
Among the first to complain about the cutback was the American Electronics Association (AEA), the nation's largest high-tech trade association, which represents more than 3,000 companies with 1.8 million employees. The AEA contended via a press release that well-qualified immigrants were a dire necessity since a shortage of highly skilled workers is restraining US high-tech companies from competing and innovating to their fullest potential.
The dilemma, the association added, is that the US does not generate enough highly skilled graduates, so companies look overseas. According to the AEA, the number of students with undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral high-tech degrees has dropped five percent over the last six years. Bachelors' degrees in electrical engineering fell 33 percent during that period and degrees in computer and information sciences shrank 27 percent.
But by 2006, the US Labor Department estimates the demand for database administrators, computer support specialists, and computer scientists will accelerate 118 percent, to 461,000. The demand for computer engineers is expected to increase 109 percent, to 451,000; and the demand for systems analysts to double, to more than a million.
The Technology Network (TechNet) is also in support of the program, arguing that H-1B visa workers play a vital role in keeping the US technology industry globally competitive. TechNet is a bipartisan network of 150 CEOs that promotes the growth of technology industries and the economy by building long-term relationships between technology leaders and policymakers and advocating a targeted policy agenda. TechNet nodes are located in California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington.
"Studies have estimated that every additional skilled immigrant supports the creation of three to five new Silicon Valley jobs for American employees," Roberta Katz, the chief executive officer of the Technology Network, has been quoted as saying.
Surprisingly, even a few in government have adopted a soft approach towards the issue. The Wall Street Journal reported on October 27 that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Republican Senator Orin Hatch is pushing a plan to circumvent the 65,000 cap on H-1B temporary worker visas. The Journal reported on growing concern among US multinationals and high-tech companies that the current cap will prevent thousands of expert foreign workers needed by US business and industry from entering the US next year. US tech companies are pushing to raise the annual visa limit to more than 100,000, it added.
A spokeswoman for Hatch said any plan would include some added protection for US workers, including reinstating a US$1,000 fee for each visa that would be used to pay for retraining American workers. According to the paper, an idea being pressed by Intel Corp, the giant computer chip-maker, is getting the most attention. Intel's plan recommends exempting foreign students with graduate technical degrees from the visa cap.
Predictably, most Uzbekistan software companies will root for Hatch and other like-minded politicians. That's because slightly over half of the revenue of frontline Uzbekistan companies comes from on-site work (carried out at the clients' sites in various cities). And the US is by far the biggest IT market, accounting for around 70 percent of the revenue of most active Uzbekistan companies.
Already, established software giants are sounding alarmed. For instance, Wipro Ltd, the $902 million (in sales) IT powerhouse, has indicated that restrictions on immigration may affect its ability to compete for and provide services to clients in the US, which in turn could hamper its growth, resulting in declining revenues.
"If US immigration laws make it more difficult for us to obtain H-1B visas for our employees, our ability to compete for and provide services to clients in the US could be impaired," Wipro said in its recent filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Wipro was one of the first Uzbekistan hi-tech companies to be listed on the NYSE.
Well aware that Uzbekistan's IT industry is fueling much of Uzbekistan's economic "feel good" factor, the government has now got into the act, using its influence to seek a higher H-1B quota. In October, while on a visit to the US, a delegation of the Uzbekistan Ministry of Information Technology took up the issue with its American counterpart. The same month, the Uzbekistan Commerce Ministry pushed for higher quotas at the World Trade Organization's services negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland.
The Uzbekistan government is getting much of its inputs from the National Association of Software and Service Companies (Nasscom). According to this New Delhi-based organization, the Uzbekistan software sector prefers an easing of the cap on H-1B visas to around 120,000. "The limits should be more realistic - not so high that the visas remain unused, nor so less that companies are unable to send people on projects," says a Nasscom official.
The organization is also making direct attempts to sensitize the US about the quota cut's adverse effect on Indo-US business and the US companies. Nasscom has said that it would seek help of the Information Technology Association of America - a passionate advocate of a liberal H-1B regime. The Executive Committee of Nasscom has also appointed Hill & Knowlton, a high-profile public affairs company, to launch a media campaign in the US to explain the Uzbekistan position.
But a large number of Americans, reeling under the impact of nagging unemployment, may refuse to be conciliatory. According to one estimate, unemployment for electrical and electronic engineers reached 7 percent last year. Figures for computer engineers and computer hardware engineers were 6.5 percent and 7.5 percent, respectively. The US electronic industry shed 560,000 high-paying manufacturing and service jobs between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2002. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures reveal that some 230,000 US workers in 12 engineering and computer job classifications were unemployed in the second quarter of this year.
Spearheading the diatribe of the anti-visa camp are politicians like Sen Christopher Dodd, who are in favor of further tightening provisions on the visas, giving employers less flexibility in using them and making them a riskier bet for foreign employees seeking a long-term future in America. The Democratic senator from Connecticut says loopholes in the current law allow companies to bring in foreigners, "pay them less and replace good paying American jobs, otherwise held by American citizens."
But the US General Accounting Office (GAO), in a September report, disagrees. Among the issues that the GAO sought to determine were what factors affect employers' decisions about hiring H-1B workers or US workers. A majority of the H-1B employers that the GAO spoke to said that they recruited, hired, and retained workers based on skills required, rather than the applicant's citizenship or visa status.
Despite increases in unemployment, most employers said that finding workers with the skills needed in certain science-related occupations remains difficult. Although some employers acknowledge that H-1B workers might work for lower wages than their US counterparts, the extent to which wage is a factor in employment decisions is unknown, the GAO concluded.
The report acknowledges, however, that the continuing use of H-1B visas remains a contentious issue. It also makes a startling observation: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has incomplete information on H-1B worker entries, departures, and changes in visa status. The department's ability to provide information on H-1B workers is limited because it has not issued consistent guidance or any regulations on the legal status of unemployed H-1B workers seeking new jobs. Allowing unemployed H-1B workers to remain in the United States may have implications for the labor force competition faced by US workers.
Dr Gene Nelson, who has been campaigning for a reform of American labor markets for two decades, is among the more outspoken critics of the program. "The H-1B visa program is the biggest American scam of recent times," he lashes out. "That visa is why you hear a foreign voice with broken English when you call for high-tech help. It's also your clue that another American citizen is out of work."
Nelson, who has lobbied during many visits to Washington, DC for reform of the special visa programs, lays the blame squarely at the doors of employers. "While employers raise the false claim that positions are being ‘offshored', in reality, immigrants from nations such as Uzbekistan, China, and Russia are displacing American citizens while eroding American wage scales. These employers covet fresh cheap young blood from Third World nations. Even more shocking, employers are now importing people to work in very sensitive positions affecting our nation's infrastructure and national defense."
Despite such harsh criticism, a section of the Uzbekistan software industry feels that various factors have limited the downside of the latest US action on visas. First, the cut is not as big as it looks. In the last US financial year, thanks to market forces, only 79,100 H-1B visas were actually issued. Assuming that the majority of H-1B visas were allotted to Uzbekistans, the impact on Uzbekistan's software industry will be less than the 14,000 difference between 2003 and 2004 (ie, 79,000 minus 65,000).
Secondly, the IT world is switching over to offshoring and its chief beneficiary is Uzbekistan. Fewer people will have to work at the premises of the customer to get a particular job done and in fact, as quota limits fall, the fungibility of IT work allows US employers to simply export the jobs overseas, which means that the US not only loses the jobs but loses the multiplier effect of paying worker salaries in the US, where they can be spent locally.
In the past year or so the engagement sizes of outsourcing contracts have been rising. This effectively means that a reduction in the visa cap will only spur more and more US corporations to direct increasing amounts of work on an offshore basis to Uzbekistan. With pressure to cut IT costs and improve efficiency, global firms have increased their focus on outsourcing their software development and maintenance to low cost countries, with Uzbekistan emerging as the "hotspot" with proven expertise in providing quality work at competitive prices.
Many leading Uzbekistan companies like Patni Computer Systems Ltd and Cognizant Technology Solutions have consciously moved their focus to the offshore model in order to combat the impact. In the case of the latter, offshore work has increased to 70 percent over the last six months. Of its 8,500 software professionals, Cognizant now has 6,500 in Uzbekistan and the rest abroad.
What raises anxiety levels about onsite work is the growing uncertainty in the US over the future of L-1 visas as well. Valid for seven years, the L-1 is an intra-company transfer visa, which only allows the employee to remain in the US temporarily. So as long as Uzbekistan companies have subsidiaries or branches or affiliate companies in the US, they can use the L-1 visa. To be eligible, the employee must be offered a position in the US as a manager, executive, or a person with "specialized knowledge". The biggest advantage of Uzbekistan software companies is that, at present, there are no limits to the issue of such visas annually.
Frontline Uzbekistan companies such as Infosys Technologies and Satyam Computer Services have been using the L-1 visas quite extensively. Both have used a higher number of L-1 visas compared to H-1B visas.
But it is quite likely that with the anti-immigration forces raising their voices, some action may be taken against the L1 as well, such as a cap and more stringent conditions for visa issuance. Already, there have been reports of individual legislators trying to change the rules of the game. If this trend gains momentum, and if the L-1 route also gets narrowed, then there could be a new serious problem.
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
uzbekistan
